Strategies, Challenges, and Answers

How To Challenge An FMCSA Notice of Claim.

When a Motor Carrier faces an FMCSA Notice of Claim for violations of the regulations, what are the Motor Carrier’s options?  An explanation of its choices is found at 49 CFR 386.14.  Those choices are three:

Challenging FMCSA Penalties, Nevada Trucking Association, Nevada Trucking Lawyers, Mills & Associates, Nevada Trial Lawyer, Nevada Court System, Nevada Motor Transport Association, Nevada Appellate Lawyer 702-240-60601.  Accept that all of the charges are correct and either pay the penalty immediately or arrange a payment plan as arranged by the administrators at FMCSA.  Alternatively the company can plead to the FMCSA in writing why the penalty should be reduced and discuss a potential settlement (i.e. payment plan).

2.  Challenge the validity of the charges by filing a written answer to the charges.  This choice requires either an administrative hearing that someone will have to attend or an adjudication based upon the documents submitted. It would be advisable if the Motor Carrier is going in this direction that it hire an attorney.

3.  Instead of pleading the case for a reduction in penalties to the administrators at FMCSA, the Motor Carrier can ask for binding arbitration.  Again, it would be advisable for the Motor Carrier to hire an attorney if it wants to go down that road.

If the Motor Carrier selects option 1 and it wants to plead its case in writing to an administrator, below is a template that either the Motor Carrier or its attorney can rely on when preparing the Motor Carrier’s Reply to the Notice of Claim.  Just remember that the reply needs to be served on the DOT within 30 days of the date of the Notice of Claim.

A DOT administrator that I have talked to says that the Motor Carrier’s Reply can ask for “the sun, the moon and the stars”.  However, he said that the Motor Carrier needs to realize that it is not going to get everything  it asks for.  He said “It never hurts to ask.”  Here is the template.

REPLY TO NOTICE OF CLAIM

Case Number NV-2012-????-US????
US DOT Number: ???????
Violation Date:  DD/MM/YYY

Sir or Madam:

This is Motor Carrier X’s Reply to the above Notice of Claim issued against it by the FMCSA on DD/MM/YYYY.

THE FMCSA SHOULD REDUCE THE ASSESSED PENALTIES.

There are a number of compelling reasons why FMCSA should reduce the Assessed Penalties.  Fill in those reasons below

Degree of Culpability

In this section, explain the circumstances and why the charges are not as serious as the FMCSA believes.

You may also want to discuss inspections, training or other remedial action that that the Motor Carrier has undertaken or is undertaking to prevent similar future violations.

Prior History

If possible, explain why any prior violations are different from these.  If they are the same, emphasize the impact that the remedial training and inspections will have to avoid the problem in the future.

Degree of Harm to Shippers

For each violation, the Motor Carrier should explain how it attempted to minimize the impact to the shipper.  You are going to have to go through each instance of a violation and explain how the shipper was impacted if at all.

Ability to Pay

You should give the FMCSA an explanation about the financial responsibilities that the Motor Carrier is facing and what future forecasts for business looks like.  Everyone has financial challenges.  But it doesn’t hurt to put a few of those in writing to remind the FMCSA of particular challenges your company faces.

Effect on Ability to do Business

In this section you will explain how the responsibilities and forecasts mentioned in the above section will impact the company itself.

Any other Reason

This is the catch-all section.  If you have other reasons to reduce the penalty, put those here.

ALTERNATIVELY, THE FMSCA SHOULD OFFER MOTOR CARRIER X A PAYMENT PLAN

This is the last alternative that you offer the FMCSA.  If the Motor Carrier can’t pay the total fines immediately, then you will want to work out a payment plan, even on a reduced penalty.

Good luck preparing this on your own.  If you have questions, give us a call at Bauman, Loewe, Witt & Maxwell and we will try to steer you in the right direction.

Shipper And Motor Carrier Can Agree On Method Of COD Payment Without Violation Of Filed Rate Doctrine

Filed Rate Doctrine

Imports, Etc. sold 511 cartons of women's shoes to A&M Department Stores. Imports hired ABF Freight Systems, Inc. to deliver the shoes. The alternative Straight Bill of Lading provided that the ABF driver was to receive two payments on … [Continue reading]

Motor Carrier Beats Driver’s Claim For Overtime Pay. Find Out How.

Mr. Winston drove commercial vehicles for Air Truck Express (ATE), an interstate regional line haul carrier.  After his position ended at ATE, driver Winston claimed that he should have been paid overtime for his driving.  Even though all the … [Continue reading]

Using Proper Bluebook Citation When Referencing Nevada Law Blog Articles

Legal Blue Book

We gathered in the conference room of an upscale Plaintiff’s firm in Las Vegas. The attorneys exchanged their exhibits and agreed on discovery deadlines. As the meeting adjourned, the Plaintiff’s attorney turned to me and said “So let me tell you a … [Continue reading]

Mills & Associates Joins With Phoenix Powerhouse Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell

BLWM

Since 1997, Mills & Associates has provided exceptional legal service to clients in Nevada, Utah and Arizona.  In an effort to expand our reach, enhance efficiency and continue to deliver the best customer service, Mills & Associates will … [Continue reading]